Categories
Springfield Injury Lawyer Blog Workers Compensation

The Illinois Supreme Court Says Petitioner Does Not Have to Show Increased Risk from General Public

In Illinois several appellate court cases had held that a petitioner in a workers compensation claim must show that he or she had been exposed to a risk of injury to a degree greater than the public in order to prove a compensable accident.  The Supreme Court in Illinois has now been corrected that rule by holding that an injury victim need only prove he or she got injured and work-related accident. The case is called McAllister vs Illinois Workers Compensation Commission. This case applies to common everyday activities like standing from the kneeling position, bending, reaching, or twisting.  In older      Read more…

Categories
Springfield Injury Lawyer Blog Workers Compensation

What is Permanent Total Disability?

Permanent total disability in Illinois worker’s compensation claims means that a person is entitled to total disability for life. If someone has a permanent total disability. they are entitled to two-thirds of their average weekly wage for life. This is much like temporary total disability, but it is permanent. What is “Person as a Whole” Designation? Many people confuse total permanent disability with the designation of the “Person as A Whole”, which is 500 weeks of disability. Five-hundred weeks of disability is 9.6 years; whereas, permanent total disability lasts for an injured worker’s life. How do I get permanent total disability?      Read more…

Categories
Springfield Injury Lawyer Blog Workers Compensation

“Two-Doctor Rule”

In Illinois Worker’s Compensations victims are entitled to two doctors and their referral chains. When we get cases in, often workers have already used one of their choices. We have had many people come in who have been referred to a doctor of the employer’s choice. When the employer does this they often misrepresent or suggest to the worker that they are required to go to these particular doctors. The selected doctor is often pro insurance company and not very friendly to injury victims. This selection can have a huge impact on a person’s case by the time the case      Read more…

Categories
Springfield Injury Lawyer Blog Workers Compensation

Ice vs Water

The courts in Dukich vs. Illinois Worker’s Compensation Commission recently misapplied, in my opinion, the law, as it applies to falls on premises. The losses previously been that wherever there is a fall on premises, so long as it arises from a defect, like snow, or ice, that the fall is compensable. This often occurs as people are coming to and going from work. Dukich acknowledges these cases but makes a strange distinction. The worker was going to lunch when she fell in a parking lot that was wet from rain. The arbitrator awarded benefits. The Worker’s Compensation commission reversed the finding      Read more…

Categories
Springfield Injury Lawyer Blog Tort Reform Workers Compensation

Why the “Primary Cause” Test in Illinois Workers Compensation Claims is a Bad Idea

The court in Steak and Shake vs the Worker’s Compensation Commission addressed what is now a common issue in politics. Groups in Illinois wish to limit liability for workers’ compensation claims by only allowing the case to be compensable if it is the “primary cause” of the condition. This naturally sounds reasonable to people in the public. Why shouldn’t the primary cause be the test? What people fail to appreciate is that “primary cause” in workers’ compensation claims really means eliminating aggravations of pre-existing injuries as claims. The Steak and Shake case is it is a good example of why suing “primary cause” as      Read more…

Categories
Springfield Injury Lawyer Blog Workers Compensation

A combination of Wage Loss Differential and Permanent Total Disability

In Chlada vs Illinois Workers Compensation Commission the Workers Compensation Commission ruled that a person can get a wage loss differential and a permanent total claim.  The case involved two injuries.  The first injury resulted in the person being paid less than before the injury. After the second injury the worker could not work at all. In Chlada the injured worker had an injury to his low back first, lifting beer as a beer truck driver. The worker got hurt again on October 23, 2003, when he hurt his neck working in the warehouse.  The worker filed two claims, one for each      Read more…

Categories
Springfield Injury Lawyer Blog Tort Reform Workers Compensation

Indiana Workers Compensation – Interview with George Patrick

We had the honor of having George Patrick, a workers compensation lawyer from Indiana, on the radio on Saturday, March 14, 2015, Pi day.  This is especially interesting to me because I have heard so many people talk about the differences between the Illinois Worker’s Compensation system in the Indiana Workers Compensation System.  Some people believe that Illinois should save money by following in the footsteps of Indiana. This interview followed the recent ProPublic/NPR report about how states are demolishing their workers compensation systems.  Judges have called the modern workers compensation systems “inhumane” according to ProPublica/NPR. In the same week, OSHA (Labor      Read more…

Categories
Springfield Injury Lawyer Blog Workers Compensation

Medical Records as Hearsay in Workers Compensation Claims

In worker’s compensation claims employees and employers typically put medical records of the petitioner and evidence. The doctors are often not usually called as witnesses.  Recent changes to the Worker’s Compensation Act provided for a simple method of entering records into evidence. Medical records are typically allowed into evidence if they are subpoenaed by a party. However, doctors’ notes that are prepared for litigation purposes are typically hearsay and not allowed. In that context, the case entitled RG Construction Services vs the Illinois Worker’s Compensation Commission came up.  In RG Construction the petitioner injured his knee at work when he fell off the stilts      Read more…

Categories
Springfield Injury Lawyer Blog Workers Compensation

Wage Loss and PPD Award in Consolidated Case

If the petitioner has two cases the Illinois Workers Compensation Commission can award both a permanent partial disability award and a wage loss differential award. Go here to see a video of me discussing the case Deerfield case with TJ Hart on Let’s Talk Law. In the case entitled Deerfield vs the Illinois Worker’s Compensation Commission the appellate court ruled that a petitioner who is injured twice at work can receive award for both permanent partial disability and wage loss. In Deerfield, both cases were consolidated because they both involve the same workplace and the same injured worker. The workplace (Respondent) tried to argue that Petitioner      Read more…

Categories
Contingent Fees Insurance Law Medical Malpractice Personal Injury Springfield Injury Lawyer Blog Workers Compensation

Caselaw Update

I spoke at the Illinois Trial Lawyers seminar in September 2014. I gave an update on tort law.  Below is a breakdown of the cases that I discussed.  There were a few already on this blog that I did not include.  Enjoy.  Feel free to contact me at Ackerman Law Office if you have questions or want to hire me.  217-789-1977. Sharbono v Hilborn  In Sharborno v Hilborn a woman went in for a mammogram in November 2004.  The defendant Dr. concluded that the lesion was benign. He did not order a biopsy. Two years later she went to her family doctor complaining of cramping her      Read more…